State Capacity, Reciprocity, and the Social Contract
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Agency, Cyberspace, and Social Contract
The social contract has been about rights and responsibilities in human societies. Facebook and its role in manufacturing and sustaining a global social contract, a new “we” is clearly one of the research areas that needs more attention. A new “we” is coming of age in the new age of connectivity and communication with a new outlook toward responsibility and rights at individual and collective l...
متن کاملSocial Reciprocity
We define social reciprocity as the act of demonstrating one’s disapproval, at some personal cost, for the violation of widely-held norms (e.g., don’t free ride). Social reciprocity differs from standard notions of reciprocity because social reciprocators intervene whenever a norm is violated and do not condition intervention on potential future payoffs, revenge, or altruism. Instead, we posit ...
متن کاملCooperation dynamics of generalized reciprocity in state-based social dilemmas
We introduce a framework for studying social dilemmas in networked societies where individuals follow a simple state-based behavioral mechanism based on generalized reciprocity, which is rooted in the principle “help anyone if helped by someone”. Within this general framework, which applies to a wide range of social dilemmas including, among others, public goods, donation and snowdrift games, w...
متن کاملConflict and the Social Contract
We consider social contracts for resolving conflicts between two agents who are uncertain about each other’s fighting potential. Applications include international conflict, litigation, and elections. Even though only a peaceful agreement avoids a loss of resources, if this loss is small enough, then any contract must assign a positive probability of conflict. We show how the likelihood of conf...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Econometrica
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0012-9682
DOI: 10.3982/ecta16863